There are social, medical, and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. Do you think that the problems of mobile phones outweigh the benefits? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from observations or your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of using a handphone and their negative effects has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that mobile phone usage is highly beneficial, such issue might be regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that using a mobile phone has a lot of advantages, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
First and foremost, public are concerned about mobile device usage because of health issues caused by the radiation. Also, the social media available in mobile phones made the juveniles spending more time on them rather than focussing on their studies. These medical and social ramifications of a gadget use characterising the mobile phone as a villain in the society. For instance, a survey conducted by the University of Melbourne revealed that 79% of the student told that their study plans were greatly impacted by the phones.
However, the benefits of mobile phones are numerous. The mobile phone opens the door for knowledge by browsing the Internet and finding the information on-the-go. Also, these small handsets are indeed saving lot of time by allowing users to complete most of the activities without even stepping out of their bed. A survey conducted by LinkedIn, a famous job portal, revealed that 96% of the corporate companies informed that their staff productivity has been increased since they do not need to go out to perform any activity such as banking.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of using a hand phone far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a mobile phone prove the significance of their functions, but also pinpoint its useful implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18685121107 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83569450051 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602076124567 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4720266455 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.307692308 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186495720803 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760455251633 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526779785825 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116922179275 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241079169326 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.