Certain kinds of music promote learning in their life. Agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of music promoting learning and its corresponding impacts sparked heated debate drawing the undivided attention of the public. Although contested by many that certain types of music promotions are highly beneficial in learning, such issues might be regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that promotion of certain sounds can be a plus and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
First and foremost, listening to music always makes one to focus on their studies and improves concentration. For instance, a survey conducted by the University of Melbourne in 2018 showed that kids who did study while listening to certain sounds could focus well compare to the students who study without any music. This increase in concentration and focus will obviously improve their scorecards as well.
While some people posit that listening to music is a waste of time but they are not aware that the nature itself offers a vast variety of sounds. For example, an article published by The Times last month stated that more than 80% young generation are showing interest in learning by sitting in nature instead of a classroom. These special sounds can double ones' learning capabilities and thus can find lucrative jobs soon after education.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the advantages of music promotion fat outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantage of promoting certain kinds of music prove the significance, but also pinpoint its crucial implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ssroom. These special sounds can double ones learning capabilities and thus can find...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33463035019 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87393533459 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63813229572 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3866798523 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.636363636 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269131393236 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09535182804 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549882195989 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148138163918 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588688871049 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.