Company Top Level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decision. Discuss
In an organization, strategic decisions making is restricted to the management level. However, as per my opinion it is imperative for a company to take any suggestions or improvement ideas from employees irrespective at all levels. This will help the it to develop as a market leader in the long run. In this essay I will discuss some of the benefits of including employees in the decision-making process.
When employees are an integral part of decision making, it improves their engagement at work. They feel included and heard. This will help the company reduce its attrition level, which in turn will help it to control the employee turnover cost. Studies have proven, with an increase in the learning curve of the employees, its productivity and efficiency increase proportionately. This will help in utilizing the resources at an optimum level.
The backbone of a company’s success depends on its workforce. If they are committed and dedicated towards their jobs, it will help to improve the company’s revenue. Innovative ideas and thoughts can help an organization to become more profitable. One such example is of a leading FMCG industry which was running in huge losses in one of its product verticals, until an employee at the junior level suggested to restructure the packaging of the product. His idea not only helped the company recover losses it even changed its share prices to be favorable.
To conclude, every organization should have a forum or a platform to hear the voice of its employees. Access to such platforms should not be restricted to certain levels, but open to all. It will help the company to emerge as a market leader.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...espective at all levels. This will help the it to develop as a market leader in the lo...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... long run. In this essay I will discuss some of the benefits of including employees in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggested restructuring'.
Suggestion: suggested restructuring
..., until an employee at the junior level suggested to restructure the packaging of the product. His idea ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0652173913 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02045292892 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572463768116 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2415111046 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2352941176 104.977214359 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2352941176 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.17647058824 7.25397266985 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 6.9802955665 186% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202812472572 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592460914938 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545988522768 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125179658294 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486084212511 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 12.6369458128 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.