Company top level authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any discuss.
Recently the phenomenon of including bottom levels employees in decision making process and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contended by many that taking employees in top authorities is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that company should give accountability to employees and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, top hierarchy including every employee can offer society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that both crucial issues and final outcomes are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the current policies. Thus, beneficial ramification of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated rules apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of public arena, lack of knowledge of employees might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some organizational research undertaken by nobel university asserted that downside of this creative process is correlated negatively with vital issues, and personal interest of employees might affect the decision making process. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments from both sides, I profoundly believe that including lower levels of employees in top authorities is beneficial for any company. Not only do the advantages of this unique process prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that both crucial iss...
^^
Line 15, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues potential im...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86904761905 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16129153549 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662698412698 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1307878404 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.454545455 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190362844558 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609787389588 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670058839012 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109158588681 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899946048152 0.0609392437508 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.