Cheating and lying are sometimes acceptable. Choose whether you agree or disagree with this statement and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Recently the phenomenon of cheating and lying and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contended by many sticking to the truth is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that cheating is not acceptable and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, modern life can offer society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that both crucial issues and final outcomes are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the current policies. Thus, beneficial ramification of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated rules apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of public arena, using lies and cheating might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by Nobel university asserted that downside of creative process is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments from both sides, I profoundly believe that sticking to the truth has many have benefits and its far outweigh its drawbacks.Not only do the advantages of this unique process prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Not
...fits and its far outweigh its drawbacks.Not only do the advantages of this unique p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69298245614 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12182125186 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679824561404 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0227652442 50.4703680194 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.8 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0917252629896 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348571589902 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0209675764607 0.071462118173 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0522320235025 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172554457651 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.31 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.