In the competition for consumerism, natural resources are fast depleting and run the risk of disappearing from the face of the Earth.
What steps do you think governments and people should take to protect and preserve the natural resources?
Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
In tech-savvy era everything is going fast and people consume more natural resources more than amenity. The more utilization of natural resources leeds to major problem so there is need to take strict action related to this issue and I deem that it is main responsibility of local body and masses. I will discuss my views in upcoming paragraphs.
At the outset, I want to say that there should be need to form a strict rule and law related to preservation of natural resource so everything will be under control and regulation. It is not only up to this but there is further responsibilty to follow that rules and it is only can happen is masses understand their responsibilty related to it for instance limition related to usage of petrol and diesel should be important. Further, There is need to spread awareness so that it will make the people active to become responsible and it will open their eyes for nature preservation.
Further reinforcing my view, I ponder that people can also decline the utilization of rsources to maintain ecology because if natural things will not preserve than it ultimatly affect other ecological system namely plants and animal also can be come under danger zone. Lastly, like excessive cutting of tree by human being should be prohibited by making law relatd to forest preservation.
To conclude from argument, I think that natural preservation is responsibilty of human and local body
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'needed'?
Suggestion: needed
...set, I want to say that there should be need to form a strict rule and law related t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...en their eyes for nature preservation. Further reinforcing my view, I ponder that peop...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, so, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94583333333 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83369789321 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545833333333 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 390.6 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.6083492543 50.4703680194 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.888888889 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186553187423 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829777999299 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551572459431 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125382064415 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411062587408 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 71.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.