These days, It’s an irrefutable fact that the increase in the competition for consumerism has caused the depletion of natural resources and day by day, more natural resources are on the brink of being wiped out from the face of the earth. In the following essay, I will discuss some causes associated with deletion of natural, before suggesting possible solutions.
As the demand for certain product increase, there will be an increase in the manufacturing of that product by using the natural elements. If that natural element at the brink of depletion, then it may lead to the scarcity of that natural element. As a tangible example, scientific research undertaken by the prestigious university asserted that diamond is on the brink of depletion from the face of the earth. The scarcity of the diamond has greatly impacted the scientific community as they are finding it difficult to obtain the diamond.
Manufacturing of products should be in an effective way and by keeping in consideration of the amount of natural resource is available for future use. Governments should regulate the usage of natural resources by manufacturing companies, and policies need to be made in accordance with the usage of that certain natural resources. Moreover, people need to be more proactive in knowing what resources are being used in the product that they buy. For instance, the use of the diamond on making jewellery has been restricted in certain countries in an effort to save the rest of the diamond from depletion, and for the usage in research and scientific purpose.
To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that consumerism and overproductions of the products have caused the risk of depletion of natural resources; the government and people should take proactive measure in preserving the natural resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 541, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing it difficult to obtain the diamond. Manufacturing of products should be in a...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 37, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... Manufacturing of products should be in an effective way and by keeping in consideration of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, so, then, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 31.9359605911 169% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21621621622 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98694505468 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469594594595 0.580463131201 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8229924685 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.363636364 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316515346852 0.242375264174 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12025408309 0.0925447433944 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927830936976 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205413415352 0.151781067708 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483120217603 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.