Cons of Social Media for students, teens & society.
Social media has become essential part of our lives and society in last few years. Social media is negatively affecting students and teenager’s physical and mental health, relationship and social life. Today teenagers cannot imagine their life without being on social media and sharing everything with everyone. This essay will discuss drawbacks of social media and thus lead to a reasonable conclusion.
To commence with, the first and foremost, many children have become victims of the cyberbullying over the past. As anyone can make fake accounts and do anything without being trace and it has become quite easy for anyone to bully on the internet. Teenagers get threat, intimidating messages and rumours can be spread in masses by one click which eventually create discomfort and chaos in family and in the society. For example, recently in UP police caught one person who created hundreds of fake accounts and blackmailing to teenager girls and asking for money. Thus, social media is creating chaos in teenager’s life.
To continue with, social media is affecting health of children also as children spend more time social media on virtual world so they are not active in outdoor games and become more passive which results in obesity and weaken eyesight. That is also affecting their relationship with family and parents as children prefer to spend more time with their online friends. For instance, my friend spent a lot of time on Facebook which affected his physical and his mental health as he easily gets influenced by people’s comment. So, social media is affecting students and teenagers’ health and relationship.
In conclusion, the forgoing discussion propounds the view that social media is negatively affecting life of adolescents, students and creating chaos and discomfort in the society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 8.36945812808 263% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34482758621 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80670167925 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544827586207 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4340832594 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223807766431 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919281942385 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546730871337 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152638573051 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382368644189 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.