The government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop the country. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In today’s technological era, science education has become essential part of the education system to make children ready to survive in the future. The government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop the country. I don’t agree with the notion as with science education other subjects play an equally significant role to develop the country so the government should invest in all subjects equally. This essay will discuss both sides in detail and thus lead a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, the first and foremost reason for investing in science education is to make people more logical and less superstitious. In a country like India and Bangladesh literacy rate is less because people have not studied subjects such as science in their childhood and people are superstitious like when some parts of your body flickers then it brings good luck especially eyes flickering. If people are educated then they will not become superstitious and therefore, contribute more in the development of the country not only in their own development.
On the flip side, with science education other subjects like social science, history, economics and mathematics play pivotal role in nation’s development. People learn about the history, customs of nations, economy growth and equations, those will aid the scientists and contribute in the country’s development and people feel closer link to their roots. For instance, a study shows that people are good in mathematics have more logical and reasoning skills and those are the main skills to make successful any invention of science and participate in the development of the country.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that though science education widely contributes in any country’s development, other subjects are equally imperative for the nation’s development. In my opinion, government should invest in all subjects equally to boost-up country’s development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 5.75862068966 521% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 307.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5993485342 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07340339747 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508143322476 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.8416392059 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.25 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331209332592 0.242375264174 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155719978346 0.0925447433944 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168037668728 0.071462118173 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216390070178 0.151781067708 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145082984466 0.0609392437508 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.