The government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop the country. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people believe that the state should allot greater budget in the field of science and technology instead of other curriculum programs to aid in the progress of the nation. I partially agree in the foregoing statement due to reasons such as furthering discoveries for the former and skills building for the latter.
To begin with, enhancement of previous invention for the betterment of mankind should be the one of the main focus of using government funds. Pursuing the advancement of technology comes with a price. Indeed, it will be costly as processing units nowadays are becoming smaller and smaller which are integrated in computer parts. To illustrate, mobile phones are continuously developing together with an increase in its selling price.
On the other hand, other subjects should as well be given in academic curriculum as they are the foundation of individual’s core knowledge. Other than Science, Math, English, Religion and History should still be present in the learner’s school program. These must be given an equal importance because skills require basic foundation of knowledge. In particular, when a person will be having his first work, he should be equipped with all the learnings he has gained through his years of education.
To conclude, no matter how significant science technology is in this era, the government should still not concentrate on one subject matter as a means of support for the student’s educational needs. Perhaps, the majority of wisdom and skills of children are obtained after finishing all basic and fundamental subjects while at school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...ent of mankind should be the one of the main focus of using government funds. Pursuing the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, well, while, in particular, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96464882194 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611764705882 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1073822861 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193606752006 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637238454237 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042508705908 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107134849361 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152046213818 0.0609392437508 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.