The environment we live in is in danger due to various problems. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this? What measures?
The ecosystem inhabited by humans is believed to be in adverse condition because of several predicaments. The reasons for this are pollution and over-population. The government can be pointed out as the primary responsible to address the problem. Nevertheless, environmental laws and energy efficient systems can be considered as solution. This essay will discuss my justification for the stated reasons.
To begin with, the advent of technology in the present era provides a negative impact on nature. This is probably due to the periodic emissions of obnoxious gases from industrial plants and motor vehicles in the atmosphere. Consequently, accumulation of pollution in air can deteriorate the life of living organisms such the plants as well as human beings as it may affect their health. Moreover, increase in the number of people can also have detrimental effects on the biosphere. To illustrate, more people will have their own cars that emits carbon monoxide that is harmful to the planet.
In addition, even with the pressing problems on natural resources, the state should have the power to promulgate regulations that would prevent exacerbation of the flora and fauna. They must impose strict policies and promote programs that will help save Mother Earth. Apart from this, alternative energy efficient sources and system should be given importance in research to construe upon developments in the field of power generation and supply. For example, the use of biodiesel as claimed to be environmentally friendly fuel can ultimately reduce pollution in the atmosphere.
To recapitulate, the nature wonders should be preserve by all means even with the presence of unwanted gases through implementing environmental laws under the nation’s initiative and finding energy substitutes. Indeed, people need to participate in the solution to environment to have a better dwelling to live in.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...this are pollution and over-population. The government can be pointed out as the pr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, apart from, for example, in addition, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48474576271 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14309866739 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613559322034 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4683343798 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.125 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0688865948725 0.242375264174 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0227628260417 0.0925447433944 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262850604759 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0433155074832 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182323104584 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.