Raising the price of the oil will solve the world's environmental problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Majority of the world's natural resources today are coming to its depletion while some people argue that having oil price hike can help resolve damages to flora and fauna, but I believe otherwise. There are so many other factors involve around environmental issues the globe is facing right now.
One of the culprits taking tremendous effect to the environment is the people's activities. The improper waste disposal in every household, schools, hospitals and business centers contribute significantly to the condition of mother nature. Moreover, the burning of chemicals such as carbon-containing compounds builds up in the air and can cause thinning of the ozone layer. These illustrates that increasing the price of the oil would not directly answer the problems on the environment, yet other solutions have been working out to address this.
Apart from this is that wealthy individuals might still avail fuel products no matter how high the price it could get. Not to mention the fact that these deep-pocketed humans own countless of businesses making profit to afford whatever the cost for their endless operations. As a result, the use of machines and other equipment pertinent for production is inevitable, basing it on the utilization of fuel in order for these machines to operate.
Currently, every nation is experiencing oil price increase basically because of high demand, however the supply is limited. Despite the fact that the cost of energy resources is constantly changing and unfortunately gearing upwards, the environmental adversities is still evident. This holds true in the existence of global warming as an example.
Taking everything into account, one should not rely upon a single argument for the damage to the environment without considering the other factors affecting it. Counteracting the ecosystem's degradation cannot be relieved upon raising oil prices based on the above-mentioned reasons. It will all be dependent upon the people who are consuming its resources yet, one must take an action for its rehabilitation, This is to bring back its lost grandeur and beauty that at the end of the process, benefits essentially to mankind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ecosystems'' or 'ecosystem's'?
Suggestion: ecosystems'; ecosystem's
...factors affecting it. Counteracting the ecosystems degradation cannot be relieved upon rai...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, apart from, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34110787172 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97769133732 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3878389269 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.133333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109870440908 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338151886233 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398330244002 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0596654535918 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258113567754 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.