A county becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Any nation majorily acclimatise the growth roadmap depend upon the inbound of tourists in this world. Touring a country itself is an adventure and acquiring knowledge of other culture while exploring several places. Not only the outlook of the culture unravel but it provides other advantages. This essay will discuss why inbound of tourists is highly recommended and explore the logical reasons.
Firstly, any nation possess a spectacular view of their tradition and geographically scenes and seduce the other person from same country or other countries. The roaming of citizens to have exposure of cities, site scenes actually depend on norms defined in tourism regime of a country. The voyage of country's stashed aesthetic resources should be allowed and world must know the infrastructure of the nation. People believe that the government must simplify the visa norms to give growth of economy.
Secondly, there are myriad and conspicuous advantages of tourists to develop the nation. One of them is economy factor which is assumed that 30% to 60% of revenue of nation comes from tourism sectors. Not only the employment but it provides others augment factors such as transport, taxis , restaurants, hotels etc. Ultimately government gets opportunities at international level to host a game or any events. Believing in touring from other nationalities always have a profound significant growth impact.
In conclusion, as aforementioned this essay discussed importance of visiting by international citizens and how it can be effective to get multifarious advantages. Obviously without any doubt, I reckon to agree on inbound of tourist to grow farther. Every nation should encourage other nationality's citizens not only to have exposure but it ultimately provide revenue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ended and explore the logical reasons. Firstly, any nation possess a spectacula...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...visa norms to give growth of economy. Secondly, there are myriad and conspicuo...
^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...augment factors such as transport, taxis , restaurants, hotels etc. Ultimately gov...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a profound significant growth impact. In conclusion, as aforementioned this es...
^^
Line 4, column 353, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...only to have exposure but it ultimately provide revenue.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, i reckon, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46181818182 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97893958908 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607272727273 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.3546034006 50.4703680194 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.875 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0111773995387 0.242375264174 5% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00500541911457 0.0925447433944 5% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0133105216162 0.071462118173 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0077138633287 0.151781067708 5% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00780908402635 0.0609392437508 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.