A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that mixture of nationalities has a vital effect on development of a country, while others believe different factors other than that are more important. I firmly believe that a mixture of nationalities is essential in development a flourishing a country.
From a social point of view, lifestyle is indeed bound to way of life, which means it might lead to both excitement and interesting life. For instance a group of scientist conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between advanced methods, respect as well as different cultures. Therefore, this evidence thus far support the contention that habit is not only related to food tradition but also moral values.
Moreover, in political terms, learning from each other is undoubtedly attributable to cosmopolitan city, in that it would lead to ethnic group and sharing as well as helping. A well-known example of such attribution is New York which is cause for concern since it had been mistaken in taking happiness for granted. Had it left people in advanced, it might have had the opportunity to do development. Thus, people could play a significant role in developing a country.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree with the given statement. However, as every garden may have some weeds local authorities are recommended to enforce some restrain legislation and individuals are heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'heightened'.
Suggestion: heightened
...estrain legislation and individuals are heighten their intellect.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 222.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32882882883 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12519458042 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653153153153 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8320855759 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.545454545 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.083389430997 0.242375264174 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307378901493 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352747020374 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0455428388158 0.151781067708 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041287492786 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.