The lazy journalism has become commonplace in today's digitalized world.
Explain what is it and the cause of it. How do you define "lazy" journalism and
what is the cause?
Some people believe that in digitalized world lazy journalism has become commonplace while others believe that lazy journalism is define in other terms. I entirely believe that the lazy journalism has become commonplace in today’s world.
From a social point of view lazy journalism is indeed bound to modern world, which means it might lead to both the internet and new devices. For instance, a group of reputable scientists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between social medias and searching for news as well as transferring information. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that computers are correlated with not only technology but also demands.
Moreover, in political terms, technological advances are undoubtedly attributable to the digital world, in that it would lead to laziness, searching the websites and editing news. A well-known example of such attributions is interviewing, which is cause concern since it had been mistaken in taking face to face conversations for granted. Had it used phone calls in advance, it would have had the opportunity to do lose eye contacts. Thus, exchanging pleasantries could play a significant role in socializing.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that lazy journalism has become commonplace. However, as every garden may have some weeds, local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation and individuals are heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'defined'.
Suggestion: defined
... others believe that lazy journalism is define in other terms. I entirely believe that...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'heightened'.
Suggestion: heightened
... strict legislation and individuals are heighten their intellect.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66960352423 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24862314967 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651982378855 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.253555634 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259052434142 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100170648153 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123088299287 0.071462118173 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14882678373 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128712804161 0.0609392437508 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.