Some people believe that advances in technologies and other areas postponing the day we die, while others believe that the life expectancy is not related to science and other technological progress. I entirely agree with the given statement and in my idea, there is no better time to be alive than now.
Some people believe that advances in technologies and other areas postponing the day we die, while others believe that the life expectancy is not related to science and other technological progress. I entirely agree with the given statement and in my idea, there is no better time to be alive than now.
From a social point of view, pushing boundaries is indeed bound to new medical methods, which means it might lead to both transplanting organs and new drugs. For instance, a group of reputable scientists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between using the internet and life expectancy as well as living joyfully. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that welfare correlated with not only advance medicines but also sanitation.
Moreover, in political terms, frail people are undoubtedly attributable to health plans, in that it would lead to premature death, chronic diseases and lacking of doctors. A well-known example of such attribution is X-ray machine, which is cause concern since it had been mistaken in taking life for granted. Had it used new instruments; they have had the opportunity to live longer. Thus, medical science could play a significant role in future generations.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree that advances in technology postponing the day we die and there is no better time to live than now. However, as every garden may have some weeds, local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation and individuals hoped to heighten their intellect.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3373015873 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01046664539 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650793650794 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4040427018 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.272727273 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425178078224 0.242375264174 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131186744909 0.0925447433944 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.233666742478 0.071462118173 327% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278041028585 0.151781067708 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.338795140897 0.0609392437508 556% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.