Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not.
Recently, the phenomenon of risk taking activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the experiences gain from these activities might be highly beneficial, such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the popularity of adventure activities on boosting tourism can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, extreme games can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that risky activities like extreme skiing and bungee jumping are multi-billion dollar global industry with not only bring tax income to the governments but also local tourism. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the economic prosperity of tourist activities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both attracting overseas people and improving local businesses apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of health, adventure activities might increase the consequences of risk of life. Moreover, fundamental aspects of permanent disabilities relate to this reality that the demerits of taking part in this risky activities pertain to experience thrill. As a tangible example, a scientific study undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of exciting activities is correlated negatively with uncertified safety measures. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of thrilling activities.
To conclude, I profoundly agree with taking adventure activities. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80442804428 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21231223659 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653136531365 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7940512441 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.083333333 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110050059025 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320354397374 0.0925447433944 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422387535548 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0564640506409 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387633420784 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.