Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not.
The impact of adventure activities, which are always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of risky games has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the society in recent years. It can be agreed that it has some advantages, but some people have disagreed. This essay will elaborate on both constructive and positive of dangerous activities and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
From a social standpoint, extreme games can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that risky activities like extreme skiing and bungee jumping are multi-billion dollar global industry with not only bring tax income to the governments but also local tourism. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the economic prosperity of tourist activities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both attracting overseas people and improving local businesses apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of health, adventure activities might increase the consequences of risk of life. Moreover, fundamental aspects of permanent disabilities relate to this reality that the demerits of taking part in this risky activities pertain to experience thrill. As a tangible example, a scientific study undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of exciting activities is correlated negatively with uncertified safety measures. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of thrilling activities.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of the risk-taking activities is prominent, and the government should provide adequate safety measure and it should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nceived notion of thrilling activities. From what has been discussed above, it c...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...easure and it should not be overlooked.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, look, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66417910448 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14787407001 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615671641791 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8586297501 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110470865506 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313983139753 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448677390288 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586778170997 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310844883939 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.