Climate change / global warming / environment pollution. Roles that government, corporate, and individuals can play to improve it.
The impact of climate change, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of global warming has sparked a controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the human being over the years. Public’s opinion about who should responsible for the current issues varies from person to person as some people say that government should enforce existing rules while others say corporate and individuals play an increasingly important role in protecting the environment. This essay focuses on the responsibility of people for global warming and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why authorities have the most influence, but the most conspicuous one steams from the fact that the current regulations are not sufficient since a possible explanation for this might be that increasing temperature, melting polar ice and rising sea level. For instance, recent evidence suggests that ice in the Northern will disappear in the next decade and the polar bear will distinct. Thus, the government can play a vital role in enforcing rules and regulations.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that public like organization and individuals are also significant to combat climate change as there are numerous reasons for that, but the most predominant one is that people are self-centered cause these results are likely to be related to overuse of vehicles. As an illustration, extensive research has shown that the carbon dioxide that produced by cars is the main contribution to the greenhouse effect. Hence, everyone can play a crucial role in climate change.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the responsibilities of three parties are prominent and there is abundant room for further progress in coming up with solutions to enhance current situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...solutions to enhance current situation.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98582577448 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.796556101 50.4703680194 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.181818182 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161993652443 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068618424287 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069392039064 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869187050383 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470937340675 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.