Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not.
The impact of adventure activities, which are always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of risky games has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the society in recent years. It can be agreed that it has some advantages, but some people have disagreed. This essay will elaborate on both constructive and positive of dangerous activities and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why risk-taking activities have demerits but the most conspicuous one steams from the fact that it is very risky and dangerous which can cause permanent disability. For instance, there is a skydiving instructor and a tourist were killed in a skydiving activity two years ago at Australia. Thus, risky activities can play a vital role in taking one’s life.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that personal growth is also significant in taking adventure activities as there are innumerable reasons for that, but the most predominant one lies in the fact that participating in activities is excellent as a chance to step out of one’s comfort zone. As a tangible example, studies have shown that people who are brave and take initiative to do different activities usually are top leaders.
To conclude, I profoundly agree with taking adventure activities. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent activities usually are top leaders. To conclude, I profoundly agree with tak...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33870967742 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03490575894 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608870967742 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.0192811649 50.4703680194 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.363636364 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0750475159719 0.242375264174 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272922899154 0.0925447433944 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269795345914 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0425085114321 0.151781067708 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273949512243 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.