Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not.
Recently, the phenomenon of risk-taking activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the experiences gain from these activities might be highly beneficial, such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the popularity of adventure activities on boosting tourism can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why risk-taking activities have demerits but the most conspicuous one steams from the fact that it is very risky and dangerous which can cause permanent disability. For instance, there is a skydiving instructor and a tourist were killed in a skydiving activity two years ago at Australia. Thus, risky activities can play a vital role in taking one’s life.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that personal growth is also significant in taking adventure activities as there are innumerable reasons for that, but the most predominant one lies in the fact that participating in activities is excellent as a chance to step out of one’s comfort zone. As a tangible example, studies have shown that people who are brave and take initiative to do different activities usually are top leaders.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of the risk-taking activities is prominent, and the government should provide adequate safety measure and it should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent activities usually are top leaders. From what has been discussed above, it c...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...easure and it should not be overlooked.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34959349593 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08347736157 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.4671641774 50.4703680194 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.222222222 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0902229376292 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405055852581 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0092969691613 0.071462118173 13% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0544671372503 0.151781067708 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165515959286 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.