Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not.
On the other hand, continual assessment helps to judge those students who are slow in studies and do not give their best output in time constrained exam. For example, lower age group children under 8 years get normally confused and not able to perform well when their exam is conducted under restricted time.
(In addition, the outcome depends on various factors such as whether the examination is conducted in a conducive atmosphere, whether the student is healthy during the time of the examination and also the student’s mood.)Furthermore, a single examination may not cover the scope of the subject completely especially in broad subjects such as medicine and law.
On the other hand, this assessment style is vulnerable to cheating, fraud and human error. Students' use variety of methods to cheat and they may move above their peers. Furthermore, often exams get rescheduled because of paper leak. Many students' send their papers to re-check and bribe the examiners if they are not happy with the mark.
Conclude:
To conclude, I pen down saying that, it is evident that both continual assessment and formal examinations are effective in different ways, but they also have some weaknesses. I believe, depending on student ability, the evaluation procedure should be selected. Faculty of institutes and schools must be well trained so that, they can apply holistic approach for students development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...nation and also the student's mood.Furthermore, a single examination may not cover the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, well, for example, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25221238938 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88360153351 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654867256637 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.6259039285 50.4703680194 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.7 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.25397266985 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0164470191475 0.242375264174 7% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00417505422067 0.0925447433944 5% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.012525162662 0.071462118173 18% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0104376355517 0.151781067708 7% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180785150864 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.94827586207 191% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.