international travel and tourism makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded. what measures can be taken to solve this problems?
Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tensions rather than understanding between people from different culture. There are exploring the world by visiting different places. Tourism helps to expanding the vision of traveling. But here one downside of this phenomenon of this situation is that people makes prejudiced. This essay intends to analyses the cause of this situation and suggests some ways forward.
The first and foremost cause that striking to my mind is that people are native look like down upon the traveler. For instance tourists taking their shoes inside a temple and some tourists do not cover their heads while entering the temple and it develops the bad attitude in the mind of the native people. The travelers also behave similar after getting bad response and behave from the native people. Apart from this, they create pollution when they visit another country like they throw some garbage on the roads. It also creates the resentment in the mind of the people.
Moving further towards the measurements, the individual should adopt the broader outlook and must expand their visions to enjoy their travelling. Moreover, government should conduct the seminar to promote the tourists to world freely outlook. The school teacher also teaches the students about to maintain the spic and span areas while travel to the other cities or countries. If we talk about the temples, while entering the door of any religious places, some instructions should write on the board in all languages as tourists should read and follow the instructions. It will help to long run to curb this nuisance.
To conclude, it can be reiterated that tourists can make the world sparkling. There are some drawbacks of this notion however, also having some positive effects of the tourism industries like it boost the economy of the country, in the right direction can overcome them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'analyse'.
Suggestion: analyse
...makes prejudiced. This essay intends to analyses the cause of this situation and suggest...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, while, apart from, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 315.0 242.827586207 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24126984127 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59261505227 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3567753115 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7222222222 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177785836399 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572949239047 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631004441893 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115110611175 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892365653052 0.0609392437508 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.