Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not.
These days, there is a heated debate among people about the importance of extreme sports. There are a great number of individuals who interpret the impacts of dangerous sports as thoroughly constructive, while others hold an opponent’s view. I am inclined to believe that these sports are beneficial as they could improve people’s mental and physical health.
There is no skepticism surrounding the fact that extreme sports play a pivotal role in enhancing mental and emotional well-being. To be more precise, these sports could create a feeling of accomplishment, which consequently open avenues to new achievements. Therefore, people’s enthusiasm and self-confidence will be amplified toward many daunting tasks. Take the water rafting for instance, it would help the athletes to relieve their stress and anxiety.
In other words, adventure sports could promote people’s physical fitness and strengthen their bones and muscles. Furthermore, there is little room for doubt that not only do athletes have a healthy lifestyle, but also they stay fit and in shape. To be more specific, a survey conducted by Yale University in 2015 has found that these kinds of sports are positively correlated with body posture and flexibility. As a result, dangerous sports are considered to be an effective way to keep people physically healthy.
In a nutshell, the foregoing discussion propounds the fact that extreme sports have many impressive benefits including development of people’s physical and mental well-being. I strongly believe that the merits of adventure sports far outweigh their drawbacks. It is highly recommended that people take cognizance of the risks of these games, and they should be trained under proper supervision and guidance of professional trainer.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59340659341 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14355295114 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604395604396 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6833630308 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.071428571 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.25397266985 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0347936842995 0.242375264174 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0140067285995 0.0925447433944 15% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0190039315062 0.071462118173 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0245197718104 0.151781067708 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102667465192 0.0609392437508 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.