Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. Whether you support them or not?
Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although challenged by many that the matter of supporting sports is highly beneficial such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that extreme desire can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social point of view, doing extreme sports can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of fun activities, as well as youngsters' sports, are inevitably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relationship between being supportive and having the desire to go extreme. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the mountain skiing and bungee jumping apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, dangerous sports might increase the consequences of harmful activities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of sports community could relate to this reality that the demerits of putting yourself in danger pertain to being less supportive. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of adrenaline activities is correlated negatively with sports policies. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the ski federation problems.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, the benefits of ultimate sports far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of extreme jumps prove the significance of enthusiastic sports, but also pinpoint the social sports implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61132075472 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14033010897 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652830188679 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.861207867 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.916666667 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131845896212 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449689382874 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311890261592 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0748220959396 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182047766784 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.