Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of avoiding packed products and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although challenged by many that the matter of consumer responsibilities is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that packaged goods production line can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social point of view, consumer experiences can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of quality consumptions, as well as pleasant experiences, are inevitably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relationship between consumer views and well-packaged products. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both unnecessary packaging and the production infrastructure apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, producer responsibilities might increase the consequences of low-quality produced goods. Moreover, fundamental aspects of chunky packagings could relate to this reality that the demerits of environmental-friendly packagings pertain to green packagings. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of costly production is correlated negatively with an uneducated producer. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a responsible producer.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of ignoring extra packaged goods far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of cost-effective packagings prove the significance of consumer views, but also pinpoint marketing implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98867924528 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.59357442457 2.71678728327 132% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667924528302 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3779292662 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239262971279 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741235907855 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329490433524 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124299984108 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263204393278 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 11.5310837438 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.