Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for personal life. Discuss.
Recently, the phenomenon of spending time at work and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although challenged by many that the matter of personal life is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that living a happy life can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social point of view, people’s daily life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of working overtime, as well as spending quality time with family, are inevitably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered striking a balance between work and life. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both working a full-time job and overwork problems apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, people’s personality might increase the consequences of spare time. Moreover, fundamental aspects of chronic overwork could relate to this reality that the demerits of a workaholic person pertain to family life. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of work-related stresses is correlated negatively with working extra hours. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of being qualified for work.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of leisure-time personal activities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a healthy lifestyle prove the significance of getting a lifetime work, but also pinpoint restricting work hours implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50181818182 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16817647058 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665454545455 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1774279923 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.083333333 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275591535327 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926409061519 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497796642409 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156152785134 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270773289524 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.