Nowadays, extreme sport has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world, which leads to a moot question
" is adventurous sport advantageous or not?". It is a widely held view that sport equipment is highly beneficial, whereas
I tend to believe that one must carefully weigh up the pros and cons of a sport center.
From a social point of view, physical activities are indeed bound to the Olympic Stadium, which means it might lead to
both dangerous situation and the football club. For example, a group of reputable sport scientists, working at
a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between professional athlete and physical exercise as well as physical damage. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the connection that dangerous situation is positively correlated with not only physical fitness but also severe damage.
In medical terms, exciting adventures are undoubtedly attributable to mountain climbing, in that they would lead to a wrestling match,
the tournament, and injury problems. A well-known example of such attribution is local sport club, which is cause for concern
since it had been mistaken in taking strong competition for granted. Had it done the tennis in advance, it might have had the
opportunity to do scuba diving. Thus, physical activities could play a significant role in the competitors.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that the advantages of a football league outweigh its disadvantages. However, as every garden
may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislations, and individuals are hoped to
heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
Nowadays, extreme sport has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic Stadium, which means it might lead to both dangerous situation and the footbal...
^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f reputable sport scientists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a lo...
^^^
Line 12, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tennis in advance, it might have had the opportunity to do scuba diving. Thus, ph...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56653992395 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11652572306 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657794676806 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0773174927 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.090909091 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 13.0 4.12807881773 315% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0481936566102 0.242375264174 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0174337322427 0.0925447433944 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369825308706 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0138974002686 0.151781067708 9% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341866921128 0.0609392437508 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.