Information revolution has changed the way of mass communication and had some negative effects on individual lives as well on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is irrefutable to say that the way of communication has burgeoned to become changed due to the information revolution. Although it can have profound adverse effects on peoples` lifestyle, I am inclined to highly believe that this revolution is quite beneficial and should be promoted. This essay will elucidate some reasons why the way of communication by this trend is more rational.
There are myriads of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that digital revolution has changed the process of receiving the information. For instance, to measure the effect of international media on the life, a recent scientific study conducted by Yazd University researchers in 2010 has shown that obtaining the data from electronic media make lives easier, faster as well as more convenient. This phenomenon can be acted by not only surfing on the Internet but also downloading individual`s favorite program. Hence, it is evident that, if nations use the new generation of media, their lives will impact positively.
The other predominant reason is that global communication has been developed by emerging of such popular media including Skype, IMO, and Whats App. For example, to understand the relationship between social network and gaining information, the result of a research undertaken by Tehran University researchers revealed that breaking news is positively correlated with the shape peoples` lives. It is obvious that those who use the new method of gaining facts three times more tendency to increase their mental horizon. Hence, the advantage ramification of such an idea can be seen with clarity.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments at the influence of the changing in obtain information, my personal sentiment is that such approach can make a better society, and should be supported.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ctronic media make lives easier, faster as well as more convenient. This phenomeno...
^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...popular media including Skype, IMO, and Whats App. For example, to understand the rel...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41216216216 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08610750501 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1545176595 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147175589097 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509279832105 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453298995506 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837396192479 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052178229163 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 77.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.