Home >> Pteacademic Essays

Do you?

Essay topics: Do you?

bashirheidari's picture

Recently, the phenomenon of T1 and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of N1 is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that N2 can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, T2 can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of N3, as well as N4, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered N5. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both N6 and N7 apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of science, T3 might increase the consequences of N8. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of N9 could relate to this reality that the demerits of N10 pertain to N11. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of N12 is correlated negatively with N13. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of N14.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of T4 far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of N15 prove the significance of N16, but also pinpoint N17 implications.

Essay Categories: 
Votes: 
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by other users:
Post date Users Rates More about the essay
1 month 5 days ago hana99 89 Read full essay
2 months 3 weeks ago bashirheidari 11 Read full essay
1 year 3 months ago kristinacyco 60 Read full essay
3 years 6 months ago dediharun 53 Read full essay
More essays by this user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13596491228 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17857507212 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688596491228 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2858401443 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5833333333 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0308734737173 0.242375264174 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0106049155841 0.0925447433944 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035172525926 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0204187408221 0.151781067708 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353662965305 0.0609392437508 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Pages