The information revolution has changed the ways of mass communication and had some negative and positive effects on individuals’ lives as well as on society. To what extent you are agreed or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the influence of the massive and technological information on the ways of communicating and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate among populations. Although this changes are obvious and beneficial as they regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that they can be plus as they could develop some brilliant aspects for their adherents.
From a social standpoint, there are several reasons and benefits why the impacts of the information revelution have altered the current communications. These factors are rooted in the fact of development. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these changes. Firstly, modern technology and massive information provides easy accesses and makes lives easier than past. For instance, an array of dwellers have easy access to the Internet and can do loads of their activities online. They can book hotels, restaurants, libraries and hostels on the Internet. Due to these accessibalities, a number of face to face communication have diminished. Furthermore, this revolution has strong impacts of international communities by developing social applications, websites and chatrooms.
On the one hand, there is no doubt, this changing of communication by the massive information has some opponents. They asserted that utilizing the online information and declining face to face connections have some catastrophic effects on citizens' lives in particular the youths. Namely, their confidence in real communities has decreased and probabaly they cannot communicate idealy with others. Moreover, using online information for performing the daily activities makes population lazy.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of the changes of communication by using the massive information are far more their drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 5.75862068966 330% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76666666667 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30130613882 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 379.143842365 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8792046767 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.125 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152652703425 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469969334157 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430509893114 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976194649066 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377325360451 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.