Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
These days, it has become growing trend to see people root for face-to-face communication as they believe it is better than they type of communication. As such, it has both merits and demerits, although I am opinion that the former outdo latter. I lay reasons to support my viewpoint with relevant examples.
There are myriads of arguments in favour of my stance. The most conspicuous one is that face-to-face communication give people chance to meet in person and observe their body language as body language says a lot about people. People not only realised the positive impact of face-to-face communication such as physical touch, which plays an important role in building intimate relationship, but also measured its relevance. Needless to say, all these upsides put people in good stead as far as a build good relationship is concerned.
There, however, are some pitfalls which can overwhelm the potential benefits of face-to-face communication. The primary one lies in the fact that it might be troublesome and expensive to do if people live in different countries as they have to travel. Another overt aspect of this argument is that it can't be used if people need to communicate urgently. Hence, it is apparent from aforementioned discussion why many people are concerned about the use of face-to-face communication.
In view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks, benefits of face-to-communication is too great indeed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...vert aspect of this argument is that it cant be used if people need to communicate u...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26808510638 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2511418059 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642553191489 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.118833898 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.166666667 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252042200192 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875838968465 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652225937189 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151415005009 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599915808756 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.