Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that?
Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous activities like extreme sport and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many the matter of the adventurous activity is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that extreme activities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, extreme sport can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that overcoming the fear, as well as promoting the self-confidence, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of adventurous activity on strengthening mental and physical activities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both releasing life pressure and having thrilling moments apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of booming the economic growth, extreme sports might increase the consequences of attracting tourists. Moreover, fundamental aspects of dangerous sports events would relate to this reality that the demerits of fatal illnesses pertain to permanent disability. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of mental disorders of dangerous sports is correlated negatively with high negative pressure. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of recreational activities in sports events.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of extreme sports outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of building physical strength prove the significance of being healthy, but also pinpoint practical implications of sports.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83941605839 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25089691595 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649635036496 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2119385258 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.333333333 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131342025365 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047788780632 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423294143626 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772925698802 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452341329144 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.