In this sophisticated era, there are plenty of things happen or can be supposed. Card less society can be assumed as realistic or could be contradicted. It has plethora of reasons to discuss this substantial issue. However, it might has overwhelmed pros over it's cons. In thesis, I will discuss both assertions about digital transactions and provide a generalized nutshell.
To initiate with, online spending wealth over using card transaction is itself a blessing. Electric payments are more convenient rather than carry a card everywhere. For instance, having card with you everywhere is more pathetic than doing online shopping. Therefore, folks should need to ameliorate the society with make some experiments in every month/year for the development of the nation.
Having a contradicting side in the notion upholding an opposing viewpoint on affinity card less society, more people are not familiar with e-shopping, digital payments so they habitual to carry card to make their life more comfy. Even older age masses are unaware of high technologies that now are in used in our society for overall growth of the multicultural world. Hence, it is so obvious that downside of platinum cards cannot be overlooked.
To put both perspective in conclusion for getting consequences, about not to use cards much in daily routine is not so required. While it is unreservedly salient that its boon are balancing it's demerits as well. It can be said by determining that it has more benefits than having causes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g. Electric payments are more convenient rather than carry a card everywhere. For...
^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Hence, it is so obvious that downside of platinum cards cannot be overlooked. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20491803279 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95185546484 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631147540984 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6824970633 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6666666667 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2666666667 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157875594208 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480275732113 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589855934214 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884168801281 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377675703224 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.