Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers?
Packaging is necessary to retain quality and maintain safety of the product. Sometimes the product with excessive package is a quite unnecessary to customers as well as manufacturers. Some people think that consumers should not support this by avoiding the purchase of over packaged products, while others argue that product manufacturers should take a step by reducing the package volume. I am inclined to believe that this excess packaging of the product should be stopped at producer level. The following paragraphs will analyze its disadvantages and suggest other best possible solution.
First of all, people expect some products like snacks should be less packed or unpacked. So that can be consumed on the move easily. But most of the food products are packed in plastic wrappers and cardboard sheets, which people will litter on the streets and cause environmental pollution. For instance, McDonalds is the first company, introduced over packaging food products with plastic wrappers and covers and encouraged people to eat on the go.
Second of all, manufacturing companies are reducing the quantity and quality of the products by increasing the packaging materials to survive in this competitive market. Consequently, packaging material manufacturers are making more profit by introducing advanced packaging materials. Instead, the product producers should invest in improving the quality of the products. For example, Amazon online delivery products are packed with multi layers of heavy plastic materials which are discarded and sent to landfills.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that over packaging of the products does not add any value and the producers should avoid it by investing more to enhance the quality. Further, it is expected that the people make cognizance of the fact and avoid over packaged products.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...acks should be less packed or unpacked. So that can be consumed on the move easily. But...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50871080139 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86592938061 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554006968641 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4609191688 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380318901625 0.242375264174 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131493031883 0.0925447433944 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923665995908 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245130857408 0.151781067708 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906128203946 0.0609392437508 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.