Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers?
One of the most conspicuous trend of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in a number of people is believing that consumer should avoid over packed products. There is a widespread worry is that this will only lead to a myriad of concern in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
At the outset, I would like to say that over-packaging describes products that are wrapped in more materials than is required. These days, it has become a growing concern. Firstly, shoppers should say no to such over packaging because it increases the actual prices of an item. Secondly, companies usually charge the amount of the products from the pocket of the buyers due to which they have to pay extra. Not only this, plastic packaging has adverse effect on the health of people when they consume food that is wrapped in plastic it contains harmful chemicals. As a tangible example, a wide range of example of this scenario can be seen in both developed and developing countries. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity.
Another pivotal aspect of the proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follow such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of this statement.
In view of the arguments outlined above, extra packaging ha harmful impact on the environment because it leads to landfill and more wastage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... colossal upsurge in a number of people is believing that consumer should avoid over packed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93115942029 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75326084573 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605072463768 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7762527467 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2142857143 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1578596003 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464348459345 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585820758575 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782633614432 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601162794765 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.