Do you think consumers should avoid over-packaged products or is it the responsibility of the producers? Choose you standpoint.
Over-packaging describes products that are wrapped in more material than is required. These days, it has become a growing concern. It is usually argued that who should be held responsible for halting this practice either customers or manufacturers. As far as I am concerned with this issue, I firmly presume that buyers should come forward to put a cap on this evil practice of over-packaging. I the upcoming paragraphs, I shall explain my notion.
Initially, in order to justify my point of view, I would like to stress upon the fact that shoppers should say no to such over packaging because it increases the actual prices of an item. Companies usually charge the amount of the products from the pocket of the buyers due to which they have to pay extra. Additionally, producers try to manipulate consumers by hiding the flaws of their products under beautiful packaging. They just sell defected items with the help of attractive packaging. Added to it, beautiful packed items often generate desire among people to buy needlessly, which results in increasing monthly expenditure of the customers. Not only this, plastic packaging has adverse effect on the health of people when they consume food that is wrapped in plastic it contains harmful chemicals.
Moving further, another reason which can be discussed is that extra packaging ha harmful impact on the environment because it leads to landfill and more wastage. This waste material often augments the concentration of CO2 in the surroundings which is very dangerous for the planet. Moreover, this practice also leads to deforestation because paper is the most common material used in packaging and every year thousands of trees are cut down just to produce paper. Furthermore, over packaging is also hazardous for the animal and aquatic life, as many animals die by consuming polythene s and other plastic material when these materials are disposed in rivers or sea.
To conclude, I would like to wrap it while saying that until consumers do not take any action, producers will not stop this practice. Therefore, it is liability of buyers to refuse to purchase over-packed items for the betterment of the environment and for their own welfare.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 20.9802955665 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 31.9359605911 175% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 1207.87684729 153% => OK
No of words: 362.0 242.827586207 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10220994475 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 3.92707691288 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82904893955 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 139.433497537 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588397790055 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 379.143842365 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 4.6157635468 260% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3203968603 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.647058824 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47058823529 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172770435334 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515139298473 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441746477912 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103577140719 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173738168187 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.