Do you think consumers should avoid over-packaged products or is it responsibility of the manufacturer?
Nowadays it is a frequent practice to over-package the goods by manufacturers. But due to over packaging problems like wastage and high cost arises. This essay will discuss who should be more responsible for solving over-packaging problems.
First of all, a consumer should be aware of the facts that he is paying for the additional packaging which will be of no use once teared apart. For instance, electronic accessories are often over packed and that packaging is never used once the product is taken out from the box. This leads to the excess waste which is harmful to the environment. Another example of over-packaging is fast food chains. Fast food chains nowadays give packaged food even when dining in the restaurant.
Secondly, as a producer of goods, one needs to invest in packaging materials, trained labor. This process also adds time to the total manufacturing time, thus decreases the productivity of a manufacturing unit.After all that, the price of the product must be reasonable in today's competitive world, thus directly affecting the profit window of the producer.
Overall, in my view, both consumer and manufacturer should be axiomatically responsible for using least packaging material.
Because over packaging is neither cost-effective nor usable and moreover it is harmful to the atmosphere.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...he productivity of a manufacturing unit.After all that, the price of the product must...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'using the least'.
Suggestion: using the least
...should be axiomatically responsible for using least packaging material. Because over packa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, after all, for instance, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 210.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31904761905 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09502197048 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.9049446299 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0833333333 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.25397266985 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316863792731 0.242375264174 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113057912549 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622064715949 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176146726082 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580512435957 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.