Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization?
Recently, the phenomenon of a global language and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of learning English are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that globalization can be a plus, and I will investigate it throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, studying English can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of global languages, are remarkable. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of popular languages. Thus, beneficial ramifications of globalization are crucial.
From a scientific point of view, the global language can provide the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of learning English are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient methods. Hence, predicted outcomes of globalization are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of a global language far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of learning English prove the significance of globalization, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 212.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78301886792 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36234078116 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63679245283 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2099055604 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.454545455 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292264267235 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103853060093 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063283270865 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16480955086 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322740720095 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.