The lazy journalism has become commonplace in today's digitalized world. Explain what is it and the cause of it. How do you define "lazy" journalism and what is the cause?
Recently the phenomenon of the lazy journalism and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of being commonplace are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that the digitalized world can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the commonplace journalism can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of efficient journalists, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of digitalizing the world. Hence, beneficial ramifications of hard-working editors are crucial.
From a scientific point of view, the lazy journalism can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of dismal publications are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described the non-digitalized world. Thus, predicted outcomes of the inefficient journalism are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the lazy journalism far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the digitalized world prove the significance of becoming commonplace, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 222.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7972972973 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40300931005 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63963963964 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8112662929 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219702342427 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742408609167 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451626540066 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126326447604 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035534431379 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.