Do you think the significance of English language as an international language will be lost with globalisation or its significance will increase with globalisation? What is your opinion?
The importance of English language as a global language in the future, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. With many people claiming that significance of English language will be increased, others reject this notion. The substantial influence of globalisation has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of English language with globalisation and thus will reach a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that every nation need common language to deal with different nations. According to a new research for example, studying English Language is compulsory in 80% of schools in Asian countries.
There are some pitfalls, however, that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of globalisation toward the loss of English language. But the most alarming one is rooted to the fact that each nation encourage to use their own language instead of global language. For example, 95% 0f Indian nations are using their own language while their work and meet each other. Approaches to deal with these alarms which are numerous but the most effective one is keep English as second language of other nations, but majority should have a good knowledge in English to deal internationally, which is impracticable and unattainable, but comprehensive and feasible. As an illustration, research in this area invariably reveals that last decade English language usage has been increased from 30 percent between different cultures.
In a nutshell, one can reach a conclusion that there is a noticeable development of using English with globalisation. So prominent is the impact that it has a numerous reasons to agree with the second believe, which a number of draw backs should be well handed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'new research'.
Suggestion: new research
...al with different nations. According to a new research for example, studying English Language ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
... to the fact that each nation encourage to use their own language instead of global la...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'good knowledge'.
Suggestion: good knowledge
...other nations, but majority should have a good knowledge in English to deal internationally, whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isation. So prominent is the impact that it has a numerous reasons to agree with ...
^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'reason'?
Suggestion: reason
...t is the impact that it has a numerous reasons to agree with the second believe, which...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, thus, well, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 319.0 242.827586207 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34482758621 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95068430506 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532915360502 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7371150374 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.785714286 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324001592933 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111921190377 0.0925447433944 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791848808715 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193751745042 0.151781067708 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100208283705 0.0609392437508 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.