It is important to maintain and protect beautiful buildings of the past, even if it is expensive for owners to do so. What do you think of this statement. Give reasons and examples from your own experience.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is preserving ancient buildings without considering the cost of renovation. There is a widespread worry that this will cause huge expenses and useless effort. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted and so should be rejected.
There are numerous of arguments in favour of renovating and repairing centuries-old buildings. The most preponderant one is that thanks to ancestors, to build such a creative and invaluable creations. Not only have people to spend a lot of money to reconstruct them, but they also can earn arduous income from visitors, hotel field, and so on. Needless to say, these merits stand building owners in good stead, as far as finding a considerable long-term income.
Another pivotal aspect of this point is these valuable buildings will be very important for the future generation to offer them a wide range of idea about their own culture and history. Besides, giving knowledge regarding cultural heritage and history, the owner can apply some fee for them to renovation purpose of the building. Hence, It is apparent why many people are in favour of this statement.
In view of the argument outlined above one can conclude that despite some drawbacks, benefits can get from protecting old buildings too great to ignore
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, regarding, so, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 213.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16901408451 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82321670793 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680751173709 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 379.143842365 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5327727919 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.090909091 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174651849798 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567127953451 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279184845588 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936651825108 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311831815371 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.