Recently, the phenomenon of graduates with higher wages regarding university fee payment has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question ''Should the students who go to university pay full fees than individuals who do not go to university?'' Whereas it is a widely held view that pupils who go to university should pay full fee since graduates earn higher wages in the future, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the sociological standpoint, higher job payments are bound up inextricably with the skilled academics, which indicate they lead to both skilled students and fully-paid university fees. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientist in 2015 demonstrates the relationship between university degree and highly-paid professions as well as an exponential increase in future careers. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of high-paid jobs is correlated positively with not only academic courses but also empirical experience in university.
Within the realm of occupation, without the slightest doubt, empirical experience in university attribute to academic courses, in that it would come down to higher wages, better job positions, and more occupation opportunities. A salient example of such attribution is engineering graduate, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take academic life for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint occupational problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of academic education is increasing future job opportunities with higher wages.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes ''all's well that ends well,'' after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that pupils who go to university should pay full fee since graduates earn higher wages in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56666666667 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13096364293 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613333333333 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.5024630542 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.5772476645 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.0 104.977214359 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.9669160288 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371642562037 0.242375264174 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133966579684 0.0925447433944 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171600094187 0.071462118173 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236494866651 0.151781067708 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.204740135483 0.0609392437508 336% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 12.6369458128 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 10.9458128079 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.62 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.94827586207 211% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.3980295567 135% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.5123152709 200% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.