Does the advent of internet change the role of teacher? To what extent do you agree?
Recently, the phenomenon of using internet and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of online learning is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both
constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that
live transmission can be a plus and I will
analyze that throughout this essay. From the social standpoint, teacher's role
change can can " style="white-space: pre-wrap; cursor: default;">provide the society with
some some " style="white-space: pre-wrap; cursor: default;">noticiable effects which which " style="white-space: pre-wrap; cursor: default;">are rooted in the fact that that " style="white-space: pre-wrap; cursor: default;">merits of lecture notes, as well as homework assignments, are
inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a
university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered written
assessment. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both searching in internet and
online libraries aparrently can be seen. Within the realm of science, teaching strategy might
increase the consequences of learning ability. However, e-learning could relate
to the reality that the demerits of oral examinations pertain to computer
programs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a
prestigious university has asserted that the downside of teaching staff
correlates negatively with a higher grade. Hence, it is true to presume the
preconceived notion of better performance. To conclude, while there are various compelling arguments of both sides,
I profoundly believe that the benefits of teachers using internet is far overweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of higher
education prove the sognificance of recieving a diploma, but also pinpoint a scientific project implifications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: can
...ocial standpoint, teachers role change can can ' style='white-space: pre-wra...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: some
...efault;'>provide the society with some some ' style='white-space: pre-wra...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 95, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: which
...rsor: default;'>noticiable effects which which ' style='white-space: pre-wra...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 195, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...: default;'>are rooted in the fact that that ' style='white-space: pre-wra...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.31111111111 5.00649968141 126% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.29218193798 2.71678728327 158% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637037037037 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 108.357529349 50.4703680194 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 142.0 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 4.12807881773 436% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.062954776903 0.242375264174 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0206784339453 0.0925447433944 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267627238873 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0210296993745 0.151781067708 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408553615766 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 12.6369458128 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.61 11.5310837438 170% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.5123152709 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.