Does a certain type of music affect young children's learning?
Recently, the effect of music has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “does a certain type of music affect young children’s learning?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that there are some reasons that music may enhance a child’s learning ability, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, light music is bound up inextricably with the education process, which indicates they lead to both learning periods and children ages. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between environmental factors and traditional lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in psychological benefits. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of an effective impact is correlated positively with not only changing public attitude but also curriculum policy reforms.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, any kind of music attribute to calmness, in that it would come down to efficiency, effectiveness, and productivity. A salient example of such attribution is a hidden agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take an alternative solution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint current education system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of surveillance.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that its advantages outweigh some disadvantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70034843206 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.265892152 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 139.433497537 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700348432056 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6565573144 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.846153846 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220528148015 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063314582649 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147980535986 0.071462118173 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135104105318 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184095118178 0.0609392437508 302% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.94 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.