Polygamy has led to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solutions for various situations to reduce the issues.
Recently, the phenomenon of polygamy has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “what steps can be taken to tackle this issue?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that it has led to massive divorce rate around the globe, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, polygamy is bound up inextricably with having multiple spouses, which indicates they lead to both dysfunctional families and troubled children. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between environmental factors and a hectic lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in fundamental issues. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of long-term influences is correlated positively with not only changing public attitude but also social policy reform.
Within the realm of society and culture, without the slightest doubt, being polygamous attribute to disrupted attitudes, in that it would come down to truancy, being antisocial, and asocial. A salient example of such attribution is a hidden agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take a feasible solution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint current inefficient system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of education and surveillance.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65432098765 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18408972985 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.724279835391 0.580463131201 125% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5222558438 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.909090909 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131809115743 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384266600339 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690855999296 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895419264292 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083260559961 0.0609392437508 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.36 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.