Does television removes our loneliness or not? Discuss
Recently, the phenomenon of the influence of watching TV on loneliness and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate among the populations. Although this issue is beneficial as it regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that it could be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, there are several reasons why watching the television's programs has some benefits on diminishing our loneliness. These factors are rooted in the fact of the entertainment. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these advantages. Firstly, dwellers have the tendency to be with each other and have some fun time. In this situation, they utilize some features for their entertainment, and the television is one of the most popular feature which can provide them some fun and make happiness. For instance, a considerable amount of time and money is spent annually for producing some fascinating and interesting schemes on TV. Furthermore, watching sports, in particular, football matches is one of these programs that people would like to gather in one place.
On the one hand, there is no doubt, the idea of watching TV in order to not be alone has some opponents. They asserted that some series and movies have this potential to increase the loneliness. Due to their amazing stories, settlers are far more interest in watching them and it lead to declining the communications.
In conclusion, while thare are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of watching TV on get rid of loneliness are far more outweigh their demerits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...r more interest in watching them and it lead to declining the communications. In...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21602787456 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07019458156 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592334494774 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5909036055 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.928571429 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0604859125934 0.242375264174 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0196021609755 0.0925447433944 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357352553684 0.071462118173 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0334616435193 0.151781067708 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210334131623 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.