PTE Essay On Does Television Removes Our Loneliness Or Not?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is colossal upsurge in the use of television. There are widespread worry that this will lead to a myriad of concerns in the society. Television removes our loneliness has been one of the prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. Masses of all ages face loneliness from time to time which is a significant problem all over the world. I am partially agree with this statement. The following exposition will further bolster my views in this regard.
To initiate with, there is an array of beliefs can be found upholstering the argument, but the most compelling one stems from the fact that, television is considered to be a very wonderful invention in the world. Firstly, it is a source of entertainment, for example the youngsters whose parents are busy in their job then they can entertain themselves with the help of television. Secondly, homemakers can enjoy their household chores by enjoying their music that played on the television. It is most useful for old people they can know about whats happening around all over the world in news with the help of television.
On the dark side, there are several argument in favor of my stance. One of the most preponderant ones is that television has negative consequences for juveniles in various ways. However, the fast way of getting information and entertainment make people lazy and trim down outdoor games. It invites drastic physical and psychological problems like obesity, isolation and so on. Craze for more things, distraction in studies spoil the lives of people.
To sum up, having immense benefits of television in the modern era and it is our duty to limit anything in too excess.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 407, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...blem all over the world. I am partially agree with this statement. The following expo...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 544, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...eful for old people they can know about whats happening around all over the world in ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun argument seems to be countable; consider using: 'several arguments'.
Suggestion: several arguments
...elevision. On the dark side, there are several argument in favor of my stance. One of the most ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95104895105 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86564006848 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601398601399 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4192211998 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11077509687 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360128184891 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794442883129 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073351996329 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511714841103 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.