Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease?
The importance of video communication with doctor which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. This essay will further elaborate both aspects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that video communication with doctor of beneficial and many patients to cure many diseases. For example cancer, malaria, heart attack as well as us treatment with video communication and doctor can say so many treatment of diseases. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that doctor should video chat with patients and says the treatment of diseases. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend bur one of the most alarming one is that many fake doctor video communication and say wrong treatment to patients and many doctor can wrong medicine to patients and this harmful for body. Besides, many doctor may the misguide to the patient and patients should life in danger. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of video communication with doctor are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun treatment seems to be countable; consider using: 'many treatments'.
Suggestion: many treatments
...deo communication and doctor can say so many treatment of diseases. Another pivotal aspect of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun doctor seems to be countable; consider using: 'many doctors'.
Suggestion: many doctors
...and say wrong treatment to patients and many doctor can wrong medicine to patients and this...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...mful for body. Besides, many doctor may the misguide to the patient and patients should life...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24897959184 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75917763554 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522448979592 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 395.1 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.127231474 50.4703680194 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.909090909 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.25397266985 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282812570689 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11993721895 0.0925447433944 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093221849472 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184005478256 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520007579928 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.