In the education system, assessment through written formal examination is valid or not.
Do you think that formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge at school?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in a role for traditional written exams in schools to assess students’ capabilities. There is a widespread worry that written tests are an effective method to measure one’s ability. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted and so should be rejected.
There are numerous arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that in order to attain the highest grade in these stereotyped exams, students do not require to improve in depth knowledge in a specific subject. Not only, will this traditional education system limit children to certain range of knowledge, but it will practice students to limit their knowledge to a question paper. Needless to say, these demerits have a far-reaching impact on the academic performance of students.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is this exam system does not encourage and support for every type of talents, for example, one who does not clever for memorizing may be much talented for mathematics. When academics are going to test one’s ability from certain questions it will not reasonable for others.
In view of the argument outlined above, one can conclude that drawbacks of this written exams are far-reaching indeed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'improving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: improving
...reotyped exams, students do not require to improve in depth knowledge in a specific subjec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 1207.87684729 90% => OK
No of words: 206.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29611650485 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00830299147 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611650485437 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4679892138 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.1 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0937360883909 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351703858824 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369662852049 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582366960041 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334047823324 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.